Action Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ospina, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schall, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Action Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 47-69 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1476750304040494

From Consent to Mutual Inquiry

Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research

Sonia Ospina

Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University sonia.ospina{at}nyu.edu

Jennifer Dodge

Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University

Bethany Godsoe

Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University

Joan Minieri

Member of Community Voices Heard Leadership Team

Salvador Reza

Tonatierra Community Development Institute

Ellen Schall

Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University

The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.

Key Words: action research • group relations • leadership • paradox • social change


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?