Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Action Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rolfsen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Knutstad, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transforming management fashions into praxis

Action research project in AutoParts

Monica Rolfsen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, monica.rolfsen{at}iot.ntnu.no

Gaute Knutstad

SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, gaute.knutstad{at}sintef.no

We analyze the way action research can be used to take a very conventional kind of imposed change process and turn it into a more deeply transformative and yet practically successful intervention. In the project with the automotive supplier `AutoParts' our goal was to implement team organization. AutoParts' motive was a need to give the impression of being a `lean' company, and teams were thus seen as necessary. The top manager thought of the implementation as a planned process that should be discussed in the management team and then implemented. We participated in these discussions, but meanwhile worked out practical solutions together with the actual teams of workers as an action research project. The management team did not make any progress while the bottom-up strategy was quite successful. The main reason, as we will argue, was that this process helped the teams to reach beyond the `black box' approach and start reframing how the team concept could be useful in their particular work situation. The two teams we will describe also came up with quite different team concepts because their challenges were different. In our opinion, the success could not have been achieved without the action research method, where we were considered both insiders and outsiders, spent a lot of time on the shop floor, and worked together with the team members as co-researchers to define their own concepts of the team.

Key Words: action research • management fashion • team organization

References

  • Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254—285.[CrossRef]
  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Benders, J., & van Bijsterveld, M. (2000). Leaning on lean: The reception of a management fashion on Germany. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 50—64.[CrossRef]
  • Benders, J., & van Veen, K. (2001). What is a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organizations, 8(1), 33—53.[CrossRef]
  • Besser, T. (1996). Team Toyota:Transplanting the Toyota culture to the Camry Plan in Kentucky. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boyer, R., Charron, E., Jürgens, U., & Tolliday, S. (1998). Between imitation and innovation: The transfer and hybridization of productive models in the international automobile industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, T. (2004). The fashion of management fashion: A surge too far? Organizations, 11(2), 297—306.[CrossRef]
  • Clark, T., & Salaman, G. (1998). Telling tales: Management gurus' narratives and the construction of managerial identity. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 137—161.[CrossRef]
  • Cooperrider, D.L., & Srivasta, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 129—169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Craig, D. (2005). Rip-off! The scandalous inside story of the management consulting money machine. London: Original Book Company.
  • Dohse, K., Jürgens, U., & Malsch, T. (1985). From `Fordism' to `Toyotism?' The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry. Politics & Society, 14, 115—146.[Free Full Text]
  • Elden, M., & Levin, M. (1991). Cogenerative learning. Bringing participation into action research. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 127—143). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Fals Borda, O. (1970). Subversion and development in Latin America. Genoa: Foyer John Knox.
  • Finne, H., & Nilssen, T. (1998). De selvstyrte gruppene ved Siemens I Trondheim [The autonomous groups at Siemens in Trondheim]. In T. Nilssen (Ed.), Mot et bedre arbeidsliv (pp. 59—81). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
  • Giroux, H. (2006). `It was such a handy term': Management fashion and pragmatic ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1227—1260.[CrossRef]
  • Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and development. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.
  • Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research `with' rather than `on' people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 179—188). London: Sage.
  • Huczynski, A. (1993). Management gurus. London: Routledge.
  • Jackson, B. (2001). Management gurus and management fashions. London: Routledge.
  • Jürgens, U., Malsch, T., & Dohse, K. (1989). Moderne Zeiten in der Automobilfabrik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kihn, M. (2005). House of lies: How management consultants steal your watch and then tell you the time. New York: Warner Business Books.
  • Kolb, D., Rubin, I., & McIntyre, J. (1984). Organizational psychology: An experiential approach to organizational behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ludema, J., Cooperrider, D., & Barrett, F. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 189—199). London: Sage.
  • Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (1997). The witch doctors. What management gurus are saying, why it matters and how to make sense of it. London: Mandarin Paperbacks.
  • Newell, S., Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2001). Management fads and fashions. Organization, 8(1), 5—15.[Free Full Text]
  • O'Shea, J., & Madigan, C. (1997). Dangerous company. The consulting powerhouses and the businesses they save and ruin. London: Nicholas Brealey.
  • Pascale, R. (1990). Managing on the edge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Reason, P. (Ed.) (1994). Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
  • Rolfsen, M. (2003). The tyranny of trends? Towards an alternative perspective on fads in management. In D. Tourish & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key issues in organizational communication (pp. 113—129). London: Routledge.
  • Rolfsen, M., Johnsen, A., & Knutstad, G. (2007). Action engagement: Improving researchers' involvement in action research projects. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 20(2), 53—63.[CrossRef]
  • Sandberg, Å. (Ed.) (1995). Enriching production. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Schonberger, R. (1982). Japanese manufacturing techniques: Nine hidden techniques. New York: Free Press.
  • Shingo, S. (1984). A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
  • Swantz, M.L. (1986). Ritual and symbol in transitional Zaroma society. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
  • Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. A series of occasional papers, no. 2, June. Toronto: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
  • Willoch, B. (1994). Business process reengineering. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
  • Womack, J.P., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.
  • Womack, J.P., & Jones, D. (1996). Lean thinking. London: Touchstone Books.
  • Womack, J.P., & Jones, D. (2005). Lean consumption. Harvard Business Review, 83(3), 1—12.
  • Yamashina, H. (1981). The Japanese kanban system — Fitness for use in Swedish industry. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.

Action Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 341-357 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1476750307083724


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rolfsen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Knutstad, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?