Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Action Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Learning, academics and NGOs

Can the collaborative formula work?

Marlène Buchy

Institute of Social Studies, The Netherlands, buchy{at}iss.nll

Sara Ahmed

IIM(A) Campus, India

Collaboration between NGOs and academics offers great potential for improving practical intervention as well as testing theories and challenging academic assumptions. In this article we reflect on why, despite a specific focus of an action research project on Social Learning as an appropriate process for change, the formalized `learning' part within the project was the most difficult to achieve. We argue that although at one level some of the pitfalls could easily be dismissed as bad practice, at another level, a critical analysis uncovers structural and cultural issues inherent to collaborative work between academics and practitioners. These further compound efforts to experiment with Social Learning as well as engage in action and research.

Key Words: collaborative work • facilitation • gender and water • learning journals • participatory water management

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass .
  • Basu, M. (2005). A report on `Social Learning' in two NGOs in India. Unpublished manuscript, The Hague .
  • Bolton, G. (2005). Reflective practice. Writing and professional development (2nd ed.). London: Sage .
  • Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass .
  • Buchy, M. (2004). Teaching by being: The case of participatory resource management. Journal of Higher Education in Geography, 28(1), 35—47 .
  • Buck, L., Wollenberg, E., & Edmunds, D. (2001). Social learning in the collaborative management of community forests: Lessons from the field. In E. Wollenberg et al. (Eds.), Social learning in community forestry (pp. 1—20). Bogor: CIFOR and East-West Center (Indonesia) .
  • Cracknell, B. (2001). Knowing is all: or is it? Some reflections on why the acquisitions of knowledge, focusing particularly on evaluation activities, does not always lead to action . Public Administration and Development, 21, 371—379 .[CrossRef]
  • Habermas, J. (1984). Communication and the evolution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press .
  • Keen, M., Brown , V., & Dyball, R. (Eds.) (2005). Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. London : Earthscan.
  • Kelly, D. (2005). Power and participation: Participatory resource management in south-west Queensland. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra .
  • Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach . Development and Change, 31(5), 931—960 .[CrossRef]
  • Maarleveld, M., & Dangbégnon, C. (1999). Managing natural resources: A social learning perspective . Agriculture and Human Values, 16, 267—280 .[CrossRef]
  • McDaniels, T.L., & Gregory, R. (2004). Learning as an objective within a structured risk management decision process . Environmental Sciences and Technology, 30(7), 1921—1926 .
  • Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow et al., Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3—33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass .
  • Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London: Sage .
  • Mutimikuru, T., Nyirenda, R., & Matose, F. (2002). ` Learning among ourselves' towards adaptiveness by stakeholders in forest management through social learning , in Mafungautsif . Paper presented at `The Commons in an Age of Globalization', the 9th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Zimbabwe.
  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Towards sustainability in the water sector — The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences, 64(4), 394—411 .[CrossRef]
  • Paranjpye, V., Hirsch, D., & Wolvekamp, P. (2002). Guidelines on integrating local action. Dialogue Working Paper #6, Colombo: International Water Management Institute (www.iwmi.org).
  • Roper, N. (2003). From resolution to transformation: Assessing the role and impact of dialogue project. In Berghof handbook for conflict transformation (www.berghof-handook.net ).
  • Schaap, W., & Nandi, S.S. (2005). Beyond PRA: Experiments in facilitating local action in water management . Development in Practice, 15(5), 643—654 .[CrossRef]
  • Schusler, T.M., & Pfeffer, M.J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management . Society and Natural Resources, 15, 309—326 .
  • Shor, I. (1980). Critical teaching and every day life. Boston, MA: South End Press .
  • Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation. Dialogues on transforming education. Boston, MA: Bergin and Garbey .
  • Smillie, I., & Hailey, J. (2001). Managing for change: Leadership, strategy and management in Asian NGOs. London: Earthscan .
  • Woodhill, J., & Röling, N. (1998). The second wing of the eagle: The human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In N. Röling & M. Wagemakers (Eds.), Facilitating sustainable agriculture (pp. 46—71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Action Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 358-377 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1476750307083712


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?