This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reason, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pragmatist Philosophy and Action Research

Readings and Conversation with Richard Rorty

Centre for Action Research, University of Bath, UK, mnspwr{at}management.bath.ac.uk

Richard Rorty's distinct brand of positivism is explored in relation to action research. Rorty's opposition toward the dualisms which haunt western philosophy is briefly described, his nonfoundationalist, anti-metaphysical pragmatics and his views on the contingency of the language that we use outlined. Since we can neither appeal to universal reason nor to an external reality as foundations for our claims, argument must move through a process of redescription. It is argued that just as Rorty is redescribing philosophy, so action researchers are redescribing inquiry. Rorty's ideas are compared with five basic characteristics of action research: practical knowing, democracy and participation; ways of knowing; human and ecological flourishing; and emergent form. Finally, Rorty's notion of the ironist is compared with the action researchers as reflective practitioner. The stimulating quality of Rorty's thought suggests that action researchers must find new language to describe their work, rather than be caught in the old academic metaphors of research.

Key Words: action research • pragmatic philosophy • redescription • Richard Rorty

Action Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 103-123 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/14767503030011007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. F. Chiu Critical reflection: More than nuts and bolts Action Research, June 1, 2006; 4(2): 183 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Reason Choice and Quality in Action Research Practice Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2006; 15(2): 187 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Reason A Response to J.A. McKernan Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2006; 15(2): 207 - 208. [PDF]

				T. Wakeford and M. Pimbert Prajateerpu, Power and Knowledge: The Politics of Participatory Action Research in Development Part 2. Analysis, Reflections and Implications Action Research, March 1, 2004; 2(1): 25 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Gustavsen New Forms of Knowledge Production and the Role of Action Research Action Research, October 1, 2003; 1(2): 153 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]