Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Action Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dick, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Action research literature

Themes and trends

Bob Dick

Southern Cross University, Australia, bd{at}uq.net.au

Recent action research books are reviewed. I give attention to books on appreciative inquiry, action science, systems approaches and action learning. Community, health, education and organizational applications are included. Major action research journals are noted. Based on this literature I identify a number of current trends: the growth of action research and especially appreciative inquiry; an increasing sense of community among action researchers; and growing attention to the practical details of participation and involvement. I question the absence of more material on building theory from action research, and on action research and complexity.

Key Words: action research literature • action learning • action science • appreciative inquiry • journals • trends

Action Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, 425-444 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1476750304047985
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
V. J. Friedman and T. Rogers
There is nothing so theoretical as good action research
Action Research, March 1, 2009; 7(1): 31 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
L. Poonamallee
Building grounded theory in action research through the interplay of subjective ontology and objective epistemology
Action Research, March 1, 2009; 7(1): 69 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
S. Grant and M. Humphries
Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry: Bridging an apparent paradox
Action Research, December 1, 2006; 4(4): 401 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
B. Dick
Action research literature 2004-2006: Themes and trends
Action Research, December 1, 2006; 4(4): 439 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
L. Young
Editorial: Participatory Action Research (PAR): A Research Strategy for Nursing?
West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2006; 28(5): 499 - 504.
[PDF]

Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
J. W. Higgins
Commentary by Wharf Higgins
West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2006; 28(5): 561 - 563.
[PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
I. Hughes and L. Yuan
The status of action research in the People's Republic of China
Action Research, December 1, 2005; 3(4): 383 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]